DCR Politics & Scandal: Justice Department investigated a potential ‘bribery-for-pardon’ scheme involving White House.☕☕☕

Ayyyeee… What’s Goodie Everyone. So I’m going to need for you all to catch this Tea okay. This involves the justice department investigating a Bribery for pardon scheme that involved the white house.

In August, The Justice Department investigated a potential “bribery-for-pardon” scheme in which a large political contribution would be offered in exchange for a presidential pardon by the White House, according to court records unsealed Tuesday.

The documents show that U.S. prosecutors were debating whether two individuals approached senior White House officials as unregistered lobbyists, and a related scheme in which cash would be funneled through intermediaries for a pardon or reprieve of a sentence for a defendant apparently in Federal Bureau of Prisons custody at some point. The status of the investigation is unclear.

The records were unsealed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who released an Aug. 28 opinion describing the government’s theory. The opinion granted prosecutors’ request to access search warrant evidence, including confidential emails sent among at least three individuals and their agents that could have been protected by attorney client privilege.

A government review of the evidence identified emails “indicating additional criminal activity” after scouring more than 50 digital media devices, including iPhones, iPads, laptops, thumb drives and computer and external hard drives, Howell wrote. The ruling offers glimpses of the underlying investigation, stating at one point, for example, that the government alleged at least one person “requested assistance, as a personal favor, to use his political connections.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/redacted-opinion-and-order-grand-jury-case-no-20-gj-35-in-the-matter-of-the-search-of-information-associated-with-premises-known-as-office-redacted-and-the-offices-redacted/f4011b09-01f6-42a5-93a0-3f93ca01efdb/

In a redacted footnotes, Howell’s opinion added, emails submitted by the government as exhibits “do not show any direct payment to [redacted] by [redacted] or [redacted] and instead indicate that [redacted] expected [redacted] to assist in obtaining clemency for [redacted] due to [redacted]’s past substantial campaign contributions [redacted] and [redacted]’s anticipated future contributions.”

The language of the opinion suggests that the potential pardon scheme was not the original subject of the warrants, and it is not clear whether any targets subsequently challenged any grand jury proceedings.
In her largely 18-page opinion,which is mostly blacked out, the judge granted the government’s request for investigators to access the emails, confront three people and take any further investigative steps.

The opinion was sealed. In an update to the court Nov. 25, the Justice Department asked to keep the ruling secret because it “identifies both individuals and conduct that have not been charged by the grand jury.” It continues, “This political strategy to obtain a presidential pardon was ‘parallel’ to and distinct from [redacted]’s role as an attorney advocate for [redacted].”
Howell found the response insufficient, directing the government to explain why a redacted version could not be released that did not name uncharged individuals, prompting the government to submit the now public document on Monday, she wrote.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s